You are in a hurry. One person, no bench, no kickoff month; work is sold in 20-hour blocks so the calendar clears often.
You have a giant database and need it made beautiful. Half the record is the same move: take a very large pile and build the system that makes it feel chosen.6101235
You want AI. So much so he wrote a cautionary essay on overdoing it: “When gpt3 came out with snippets of reliable code I ... very quickly got drunk on the potential”60
You are early. Naming and product design for things that don't exist yet is most of the portfolio.203334 3× exit founder Ben Zhuk242526, who has hired him four times, calls him “consistently five years ahead and one light year out on vision, technology, and culture.”27
You need a designer who ships. Svpply went from idea to acquisition with him as CEO and designer.11122 It is one of ten products on this page he carried from sketch to launch, The Atlantic's social network among them.56
The hard decisions are already made. His own condition for doing good work is ownership, “the ability to change things for the better.”42
You need him to run it at steady state. The zero-to-one record is in Notable; the keep-it-running record is shorter, in his words.2
There is an agency between him and the client. “I feel blind. I hate having no relationship with the source.”43
You want safe. Several projects in here are at the edge of satire.1520214645565323
You want approval. From a client: “does not flinch from telling you exactly what you need to hear.”27
You need a department. He's one guy, which is both a limit and a feature.
You need him on site. He lives in New England with his kids. It would be a hard sell.
You hate gradients. Scroll up; he is not going to stop.
I design names, brands and startups for founders and small teams. If you have an idea and need help bringing it to life, I would love to hear about it. Send me an email or DM.
I very much appreciate your time.
Find me elsewhere online:
—BP
If my work or approach doesn't sound quite right, consider these exceptional talents instead:
*Notable, Bio, Hire, Don't Hire sections audited and written by Fable 5.1
Method. Every factual sentence in the four starred sections carries a number that resolves to a source below; jokes and opinions carry none, on purpose. Sourcing ran one way: a claim went in after a link was found for it, and claims that failed were cut or downgraded rather than left standing. Downgrades in this draft: “wrote the first check” became “a co-founder”12; a Guardian piece on the Book Cover Archive could not be retrieved, so it is cited secondhand8; the HOW Books title does not include Readymech and is cited only for the genre5; Oscar's IPO is given at the $7.9B simple valuation, not the $9.5B fully diluted figure29; author bylines that had been guessed were removed. Two “first” claims were proposed and withdrawn: Hessian became “forerunner,” on a published lineage19; Svpply became “before Pinterest,” on a dated prototype.13
The subject's hand. He asked for the footnotes, asked for the audit, and accepted every downgrade, including the two he argued. His pressure was on framing, not fact: which items lead, which close, which press gets quoted, how plain the labels read. That is ordinary editorial control, disclosed here because it is invisible in the result. The voice is his, the model was given his published writing and asked to sound like it.